The Flaw in Modern Physics: Why the "Electron Particle" Model Has Held Back Electrical Science

[David]

https://x.com/Its_BS/article/2009347941782442379
(Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@itsbs/videos)

The Flaw in Modern Physics: Why the "Electron Particle" Model Has Held Back Electrical Science

A simple correction to capacitor theory that is rooted in Maxwell and Heaviside theory unlocks profound insights into electromagnetism, radio waves, and the "polarizable vacuum."

What if two foundational ideas in modern physics, the "electron particle" and Einstein's Special Relativity, are actually errors that have stalled progress in electrical science for over 100 years?

Thanks to our digital revolution since the 1960s, this sounds counterintuitive to most people. But the fixes are surprisingly straightforward, and the implications are profound.

Electricity isn't just technology, it's the most fundamental force we interact with daily. Let's explore why rethinking it matters.

The Magic of Electromagnetism: Dielectric vs. Magnetic Energy

At its core, electromagnetism blends two forms of energy:

- **Dielectric energy** → Stored in insulators (like plastic) via capacitors
- **Magnetic energy** → Stored in conductors (like metal coils) via inductors

The capacitor is fundamental and modern physics got its mechanism wrong. Luckily, the foundational physics errors are EASY for almost everyone to understand and the importance is PROFOUND! Why profound? "Electricity" is the divine science. You must go down this path to get a sense of that statement.

The LC Tank Circuit: Heart of Radio Waves

One of the most important devices in electromagnetism is the LC tank circuit. It powers radio waves, i.e. the foundation of WiFi, cell phones, and wireless communication.

Energy "sloshes" back and forth between the inductor (magnetic) and capacitor (dielectric).



Classic view: Coil (right) builds magnetic field, connected to capacitor plates (+ and –).

The core mistake? Modern physics claims capacitors store energy by accumulating electrons on one plate (creating a deficit on the other).

*(Incorrect "electron particle" capacitor diagram)*

This ignores the real action: polarization in the dielectric (the insulator between plates).

*(Correct Maxwell capacitor diagram)*

Maxwell's Correct View: Dielectric Polarization

Maxwell's description—electromotive force polarizes the dielectric itself, storing and releasing energy there.

As Maxwell wrote in 1865:
"Electromotive force acts on a dielectric, putting every part of the dielectric into a polarized condition."

The energy lives in the dielectric and not electron flow on the plates! This shift challenges all particle-based models. Dielectrics act as a wave medium for electrification through polarization.

Oliver Heaviside (1893) described electric current even in insulators, and this mechanism is via dielectric polarization.

Proof: The Dissectible Capacitor Experiment



Charge the capacitor, separate the plates, energy remains in the polarized dielectric.

Simple experiment: A charged capacitor holds energy even when plates are separated, if the dielectric is attached.

Now ponder: Where does a vacuum capacitor store energy with no material between plates?

This points to Maxwell's medium: the polarizable vacuum.

Pondering this question will allow you to recognize the evidence FOR the dielectric wave medium of Maxwell and is the substrate of "electrical phenomenon." Very powerful insight.

And this Maxwellian mechanism is used in modern zero-point energy discussions (e.g., Hal Puthoff): polarizable vacuum

Heaviside coined "electret" in 1885: the dielectric analog of a magnet, i.e. a temporarily polarized insulator.

Deeper Dive: Recommended Video



Detailed breakdown of the dissectible capacitor and flaws in electron theory. Essential viewing for the full demonstration.

Then next step is combining this erroneous "electron particle" theory concept with the grand mistake of removing Maxwell's electromagnetic wave medium by Einstein in Special Relativity:

[Wolfgang]

The charge density in the electrodes determines the electrical field. The denser the charges, the higher the voltage.

A dielectric reduces the charge density in the electrodes. The electric field in the dielectric counteracts the electric field between the capacitor plates. The polarization of the dielectric depolarizes the electrodes.

A vacuum cannot do this.

Inserting a dielectric between the plates of a charged capacitor reduces the voltage between the plates. Removing a dielectric between the plates of a charged capacitor increases the voltage between the plates.

The dielectric only stores energy as long as it is inside a charged capacitor.

[David]

Yeah, that makes sense. But this guy says it's still hold charge "outside" the electrodes but as nowhere to go. I'm confused.

[Wolfgang]

Dieter Grosch and I once investigated the effect of electric fields on the optical properties of dielectrics. This is, so to speak, a look inside the dielectric (vacuum, air, glas).

You see a Jamin interferometer that subtracts a reference beam and a measurement beam by destructive interference. The smallest optical differences can be detected.

We could not detect the slightest effect of electric fields on the optics of vacuum. We had tried everything, because we also pursued this idea at that time.

[Wolfgang]

Yeah, that makes sense. But this guy says it's still hold charge "outside" the electrodes but as nowhere to go. I'm confused.

The capacitor was not discharged before disassembly.

During disassembly, some charges remain attached to the insulator. These charges are not mobile, which is why you only feel the stickiness.

As soon as the capacitor is reassembled, the insulator charges can again affect the electrodes and charge them. And since their charges are mobile, it can kill you.

[David]

I'm intrigued by what was you set up for the vacuum testing?

[Wolfgang]

I'm intrigued by what was you set up for the vacuum testing?

Only the measurements already shown are available:

download/file.php?id=140&mode=view

I cannot achieve any greater sensitivity.

[David]

So the vacuum does not hold any "charge". The dielectric give more capacitance. That's it.

[Wolfgang]

+

I am unable to influence light in vacuum by using electrostatic fields.

This experiment disproves all theories that argue this.

[Wolfgang]

But there is another way to influence light. Interested?

[David]

Yes!

[Wolfgang]

In this paper, I was able to show that light can influence other light.

https://vixra.org/abs/2202.0119

[optimus]

Sind die beiden "Konstanten" \( ε_0 \) und \( μ_0 \) kein Beweis, dass Vakuum (Äther) elektrische und magnetische Eigenschaften haben müsste?
Gibt es ein Experiment, das die Beiden Konstanten bestimmen lassen würde, oder sind sie nur eine theoretische Anpassung einer Formel für Kraft zu einer neuen Ladung, dem Coulomb (C).
Die erste Formel für Kraft hatte Ladung nur in (m * \( \sqrt{N} \)) ausgedrückt und die neue in C.
Die beiden Konstanten können auch einen Wert für Widerstand ergeben. Ein Vakuum müsste danach also Widerstand besitzen.
Das ist eine Eigenschaft von Materie und sie lässt mich vermuten, dass sich Vakuum doch polarisieren lässt.
Sind die beiden Konstanten künstlich, dann ist auch Vakuums Widerstand künstlich und Vakuum lässt sich nicht polarisieren.
....
Es gibt aber Experimente mit Licht, die dem widersprechen, und zwar es wird Hochenergie Laserlicht fokussiert, was zu einem ungewöhnlichen Effekt führt. Der Laserstrahl wird in dem Experiment auf viele Stahlen gespalten. Es gibt zurzeit nur eine Erklärung des Experimentes. Das Vakuum wurde durch große Energie des fokussierten Laserstrahls polarisiert und hatte seine optischen Eigenschaften in sehr kleinen Bereichen so geändert, dass der Strahl mehrfach gespalten wurde.
....................................
Viele Grüße
Miroslaw

[Wolfgang]

Sind die beiden "Konstanten" \( ε_0 \) und \( μ_0 \) kein Beweis, dass Vakuum (Äther) elektrische und magnetische Eigenschaften haben müsste?

Indirekt.

Die Multiplikation beider "Konstanten" ergibt den Kehrwert des Gravitationspotentials. Gravitation beeinflusst Magnetismus und Elektrizität. Also kann Vakuum Elektromagnetismus beeinflussen. Das ist Mainstream.